Good Thing There's No War On Terror
Right, John Edwards? We're wondering, of course, how to understand this foiled attack on London . . . just a big misunderstanding, perhaps?
If a Democrat wins the presidency, don't expect any muscular response if such things occur in the United States. It'll be more sweeping these episodes under the rug a la the World Trade Center bombing of 1993.
To get to the presidency, the Democrats must demonize the war effort and assume we will lose in Iraq; but to run the country, they would almost immediately have to reverse course, call for unity, and explain why we must continue anti-terrorism at home, and fighting al Qaeda abroad. And if they adopted a truly pacifist stature, a single 9/11 like attack would ruin their fides for a generation. Politics is to be accepted, but in wartime one expects a bit of national interest first.
7 Comments:
no doubt the next time he talks about it he'll be saying that these attempts were amateurish etc.
somebody help him
aint denial a grand thing mi amigo?!..sheesh~!
you have to love the Democrars whp are willing to deny evil to move their agenda. I wonder if he thinks the Holocaust never happened?
Mulims are just misunderstood... don't you dare question it!
I'm sure that Edwards thinks the whole Glasgow thing was just an accident, too, since they were apparently connected.
P.S. Joe Gringo, you've been tagged.
happy 4th mi amigo querido!!!
Post a Comment
<< Home