Under the knife....
....well actually under the 'scope. Recuperating from knee surgery, large tear on meniscus, removal of Bakers cyst and a bone spur. Things are fine, except the bone spur is what is giving me a bit of pain, right under the knee cap, oh well back to work on monday, tuesday at the latest.
I've had time to read, finished Michael Medved's "Right Turns" and am just about done with Tom Clancy's "Clear and Present Danger", both are great reads.
Christopher Hitchens delivers a brilliant essay - in the Daily Standard called "A War to Be Proud Of." His positive accounting of our accomplishments in the Bush administration's proactive war on terrorism includes these items pulled from the article:
1) The overthrow of Talibanism and Baathism, and the exposure of many highly suggestive links between the two elements of this Hitler-Stalin pact. Abu Musab al Zarqawi, who moved from Afghanistan to Iraq before the coalition intervention, has even gone to the trouble of naming his organization al Qaeda in Mesopotamia.
(2) The subsequent capitulation of Qaddafi's Libya in point of weapons of mass destruction--a capitulation that was offered not to Kofi Annan or the E.U. but to Blair and Bush.
(3) The consequent unmasking of the A.Q. Khan network for the illicit transfer of nuclear technology to Libya, Iran, and North Korea.
(4) The agreement by the United Nations that its own reform is necessary and overdue, and the unmasking of a quasi-criminal network within its elite.
(5) The craven admission by President Chirac and Chancellor Schröder, when confronted with irrefutable evidence of cheating and concealment, respecting solemn treaties, on the part of Iran, that not even this will alter their commitment to neutralism. (One had already suspected as much in the Iraqi case.)
(6) The ability to certify Iraq as actually disarmed, rather than accept the word of a psychopathic autocrat.
(7) The immense gains made by the largest stateless minority in the region--the Kurds--and the spread of this example to other states.
(8) The related encouragement of democratic and civil society movements in Egypt, Syria, and most notably Lebanon, which has regained a version of its autonomy.
(9) The violent and ignominious death of thousands of bin Ladenist infiltrators into Iraq and Afghanistan, and the real prospect of greatly enlarging this number.
(10) The training and hardening of many thousands of American servicemen and women in a battle against the forces of nihilism and absolutism, which training and hardening will surely be of great use in future combat.
Moreover, while it's not clear whether or to what extent the American public shares Hitchens' pride in what we've accomplished, Hitchens is undoubtedly correct that the public itself has displayed a fortitude of which it should be proud:
Faced with a constant drizzle of bad news and purposely demoralizing commentary, millions of people stick out their jaws and hang tight. I am no fan of populism, but I surmise that these citizens are clear on the main point: It is out of the question--plainly and absolutely out of the question--that we should surrender the keystone state of the Middle East to a rotten, murderous alliance between Baathists and bin Ladenists. When they hear the fatuous insinuation that this alliance has only been created by the resistance to it, voters know in their intestines that those who say so are soft on crime and soft on fascism.
Blogging sure is cool! More later..........
3 Comments:
Boy you have alot to say when your down! How do you think Bolton will effect the UN?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The U.N. is a mess, John Bolton may be the U.N.'s last, best help for survival. The UN is corrupt and open to bribery, just check out Claudia Rosette's work on her great work about the "Oil for Food" scandal, some say she deserves a Pulitzer Prize. (She writes for National Review - www.nationalreview.com)
How will Bolton affect the UN? First off, Bolton is more concerned about protecting America's security and prosperity than global crusades and academic theories. In the past, when there was a vital U.S. interest at stake, the UN could serve as an instrumetn of policy, when the US led, then the UN could work.
Since the Clinto administration, the UN has pretty much engaged in international social work, throwing money at underdeveloped countries, with no progress (just scandals....a la Somalia, Oil for Food) with the weatlthy nation footing the bill. Bolton will seek to put an end or at least "stop the bleeding".
Bolton will instill humanitarian relief and peacekeeping, press for management and financial reform (if you ever heard or read about Donals Trump's remarks, you'll understand, I'm now of fan Trump). Remember Bolton's remarks years back ......"If the Un building secretary building in New York lost ten stories, it wouldn't make a differnce"?
The UN needs an ass kicker, not an ass kisser, Bolton is the man.
Post a Comment
<< Home